Radioactive Boars (Part 2)

Posted by Beamer at 3:22 PM

Various links to various articles about this problem -

Yahoo News

Google search - August 30th, 2010

Independent Blog

This can't be good news

Posted by Beamer at 3:02 PM

This has been translated by Google from French language.

The original Article

The number of animals contaminated with cesium from Chernobyl is increasing in Bavaria.
It's not a joke - almost 25 years after the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl, the German wild boar remain heavily contaminated by radioactive fallout from the Ukrainian Central.

And the compensation paid by the government to hunters is increasing.

424,650 euros.

According to the Ministry of the Environment, Berlin is the sum that paid last year for hunters and hunting associations to ensure that the highly contaminated wild boar meat is sold in markets.

In 2006, these compensations were only 240,000 euros.

A ten times higher radioactivity standards

The origin of this increase: the sharp increase in the number of wild boars in the country, and the fact that their food, including mushrooms, remains heavily contaminated with cesium .

These radioactive particles spread over much of Western Europe after the accident of Chernobyl nuclear power plant in 1986, reports the German Federal Agency for the protection against radioactivity.

"In some regions, particularly in the south, the radioactivity of wild boars is ten times higher than the standards," said Florian Emrich, spokesman for the Agency.

Up to 1300 Bq / kg

"Nobody made seriously ill from eating wild boar meat," said Florian Emrich yet.

But in areas at risk, hunters are required to analyze boar slaughtered for their meat could possibly be withdrawn from circulation, as a precaution.

According to the Agency for Health and Food Safety of Bavaria , 9 of the 56 boars tested last year and had a much higher level of cesium to 600 becquerels per kilo of meat allowed for consumption. Up to ... 1300 becquerels per kilogram.

Thiws is one comment below a similar article-"
farewell - 12/08/2010 5:14 p.m.
"Reaching up ... 1300 becquerels per kilo" terrifying, no? It should give some orders of magnitude in all this before shouting to the health risk: a man of 70kg, is 7000 Bq (because of his bone and potassium carbon-14), 1 kg of fish 1000Bq ... Opium Breton fortunately you are not otherwise pretty granite stones adorn your home safely ... 1000Bq per kilogram there too) Finally, for greater accuracy should refer of Dose (whose unit is Sievert) is the unit used to measure the effects of radiation on the body (whatever its origin). For example, in France, it receives an average of 2.5 mSv / year. How do I Tchernobyliens boars eat to absorb a dose of 1 mSv? That information would have been helpful to know in order to better inform the reader about the character "alarmist" (or not) of this information ..."

I was unaware

Posted by Beamer at 11:36 PM

That the Link I had with a site by the name of Clearspring.com was bringing up an error message. The site has been removed post haste. I don't need you guys having to worry about stuff like that here.

It would seem I am Not going to win

Posted by Beamer at 12:56 PM

April 19th, 2010

I don't know if you have seen it or heard about it, but today for some reason seems like I am to find out way more about KFC's Double Down than I ever thought possible.

What I am not going to win is this battle I have created where I do not consume a KFC Double Down.

I now it is going to be greasy and fatty and not good for me. I know that. Granted there is the grilled version that will be much less fatty and greasy, but where is the fun in trying to resist the healthier version of a Double Down. Besides, My stomach doesn't work that way.

No, if given the choice, My tummy will always choose the less healthy version of what ever food is being offered. That is where my great intellect and savvy brain power steps in and says "Hang on a minute - Let me analyze this."

My stomach is a tricky beast though, and very sneaky, either that or my brain is asleep from hunger sometimes, uhm, many times.

So I am presently on page 5 of this guys review of the Double Down. I was going to blog about this guy writing 3 pages on this "sandwich". That was 2 pages ago. Granted there are lots of pictures, and he does have a creative writing style, but 5 pages on a KFC product? Maybe he is getting reimbursed for this lengthy article. I don't know.

Having gotten to the final page and realizing this guy is just plain old going overboard with his writing, I can tell by the Pictures that maybe this battle won;t be so hard to win after all. His pictures do tell quite the story.

What in Gods name will they think of Next?